Nature and geography separated Vienna’s Petar Petrov brand, and its founder and designers like it in this way. Distance from four major fashion cities may cause some logical barriers, but it allows Petrov to create its system of working with low interference and perhaps a low myopic approach. “Fashion,” the designer on a call said, “There is not a big topic here.” On the other hand, the architecture has always been, and this season the lookbook was photographed in Lushus, which was an example of the Vinise modernism produced by Adolf Luz in 1912, which published an essay called “jewelery and crime” around the same time, in which the architects argued that the Architects argued that the progress was in hand.
Petrov is also eager to eradicate FROU-FROU in the interest of serving his customer. Their work is accurate (see those linear pencil skirts) but not cold, and the sexuality of the material and fit (see the deep piles of Lux Leather and Corduroy in the opening look) cannot be described as classical minimal. “I like it’s nothing, but it’s something,” the designer said, who wore clothes dressed in this season that wrapped around the body and are safe by the same bondage. Petrov also focused on circular cuts, resulting in both the cocoon-Y with an outer attitude- “These organic figures look quite good on the body.” He said-And unexpectedly the perk skating-style miniskirts. There were tops with more dull fabrics and long scarves that can be neatly wrapped or left to move independently as the wearer, or air. Draped body-hugging tops can be drawn on the head to create an aerodynamic hood, which is particularly useful, the designer noted for the Winter Cycling. Grunge-style plaids, as a boyfriend shirt and a chic coat, easily added a welcome feeling in a sophisticated collection, which, as usual, brought the masculine stitch elements to the game.
For the fall, Petrov’s self-set challenges were to align and act with the identity of one woman as she wore. The designer said that their job is not to make clothes that are symbols of wealth, but rather enhance and enable women’s lives. “This is an interesting social moment for us in fashion to understand what the real values ​​are, and what they are for us,” they said. He hates Petar Petrov to describe Petrov as a luxury brand because I think luxury is something that doesn’t look very sexy; I think it is a lot of status symbols and with this collection I was thinking that you define luxury with your identity rather than your bank account.
As the luxury field struggles with new economic realities, the status has become a subtopic of the season. There is no consensus, in fact, how to speak, or classify how, brands that are not luxury/heritage or high road. Petrov said that fashion is not alone in ignoring the middle, “In politics – is weak everywhere.” He is combating this situation of matters to honor his vision, stick to his principles and celebrate personal expression. The designer said, “What you wear are you.” “Everything at the moment is quite democratic in a way because you can choose from different styles and keep it together in different ways. What I love is when clothes are not complicated, and they give you this ease and attitude. “This collection was just filled with those types of designs.
