Was FIA Belgium GP right to delay in starting security? F1 drivers decided

it was right

Fernando Alonso, “We know that safety is a priority, we talked about it on Friday, in the previous briefing. And I think it was not a breed situation in the beginning, so I think the race started at the right time, to be honest.”

Gabriel Bortoleo, “Security is always always. I think it was just a spray when we went out for the first time, so much aquaplaning that if we run in that situation, someone can get hurt. I like racing in every situation, but when it is not good, it is not good, and we need to be realist on it.

Pierre Galli, “To be fair, when we started, we could not see one thing in the first lap. So it was the right call to put a red flag. Then a big cloud was coming, is there probably a window for five minutes, but I think they had done the right option. Then it’s always the same question: Can you start the race again 10 minutes ago or later, they can start the right call, and (you can do it later, and (you can do a few minutes ago, but you can always argue, but (you can do a few minutes before, and (you can do a few minutes ago, but a few minutes ago, but (you can do a few minutes before, and (you can do a few minutes ago, but a few minutes ago, but (you can do a few minutes ago, and (you can do a few minutes ago, but a few minutes ago, but you can always argue, and (you can do a few minutes ago, and (you can do a few minutes ago, but a few minutes ago, but you can always argue. Finally they went to the safe side, which was right.

Liam Lawson, “Honestly, I think it was very well on time. We made some laps under the security car, the circumstances were getting better and I think it was the right time to start the race honestly. Spray is always going to spoil in Formula 1, but I don’t think there was no accident or anything. At least where I was, it was comfortable.”

Estaban Okon, “The FIA did a really good job in this sense. I think they did the right job in starting when it was the right time.”

Oscar piastry, “In the last few years, especially here, we have reacted an FIA that we will be on the safe side instead of any risk. And I think what we have done today. I think if you were agile, maybe we could have lapse a low formation. But in the grand plan of things, if this lap is very early, is it worth it?

“Also, US Three (Podium Finishers Piastre, Lando Noris And Charles Lakeler)) The worst people to ask, because we have at least cars of cars. So yes, for someone back, for the first time we tried to start the race, even with only lands for ourselves, I could not see one thing. So you can only imagine how it is for the back people. So this is always a difficult thing for balance because people in front have an easy time than the back people. ,

Yuki Sunoda, “Correct decision.”

It’s a little late, but there is no big deal

Franco Colapinto, “I think it is difficult for an FIA, saying in silverstone (people) saying it was very wet, now it was very dry, it’s difficult for them that I think. It is very difficult to judge the cars before going on the track, I think it was very wet when he had given it a red-shock once, probably it was probably too late, if we really do not give an answer.

Isac Hadzar, “We completed 44 laps. The race was well managed. Visibility was very good when we started again. Perhaps we could take less differences, but certainly handled well.”

Lewis Hamilton, “We clearly started the race a little too late, I would say. I kept shouting, it is ready to go, it is ready to go. And they kept walking round -colors. So I think they were probably overracting the previous race, where we asked them to resume the race because the visibility was bad.

“I think he has still done a good job. Of course we recalled some extreme wet racing, which I think will be good. But for some reason spray here, at least this year, it’s like going through fog. I don’t know what we are going to do to do and fix it.”

Charles Lakeler: “I think this is always a fine. I have to say that on such a track, which happened historically, I think you can’t forget about it. For this reason, I will be safe very quickly. Again, I think it is a constant discussion and perhaps it will feed the decision that perhaps it changes anything, but I don’t change anything, but I don’t change anything, but I don’t change anything, I did not change anything. “

Carlos Sainz, “In a normal track, yes, I think we could probably start 5–10 minutes ago. In the history of the spa-fankhamps and this track, it is better than (unclear). You got a full race, you got to see the whole race, so I think it is a bad call. It is an accident and regret.”

Its very late

Alex albon, “I do (think it could have started earlier). It was almost slix until we actually started. It is not certain that it would change much.

Max Verustapane, “Surely we talked to be a little more alert with decisions after silverstone, but it was at the second peak for me. (…) They did not allow us to run in the wet.

“(I preferred to run directly at 3pm) directly 3pm. It was not even raining. And certainly there was a lot of water between turn 1 and 5, but with two lapses behind the security car, then it would be much more clear. And the rest of the track was ready to go anyway. It’s a shame.

“It is not understood. Then it is better to say, you know what, let’s wait until it is completely dry and then we start with just 6, because it is not really a wet race for me.”