Professional telephoto lens, especially for wildlife and sports, can buy the most expensive money. They push the envelopes of lens technology, not mentioning size and weight. What if I told you that Sigma has created a lens that jointly distributes the same F/4 aperture with a more versatile zoom range, but only $ 6,000, compared to the competition is much less money? It sounds too good to be true.
Nevertheless, this is what Sigma has done with her new 300-600 mm F/4DG OS Sports. Certainly, this lens should have some serious compromise, right?
Sigma 300-600 mm F/4DG OS Sports: How does it feel
Sigma 300–600 mm F/4 definitely looks like a serious professional telephoto lens and feels. This game (no punishment) to reduce unnecessary heating of internal elements (no punishment) is an all-white paint job and chassis is completely weather-cellar, a adaptable control rotation, lots of adaptable buttons, and image stabilization.
There is a focus limist and a tripod collar that can be set for click-stop 90-degree details or smooth rotation when desired. The carbon fiber does a big job of protecting the front of the hood lens, and if you need it then there is a 40.5 mm drop-in filter option. I will easily easily keep this new sigma manufacturing quality against any 600 mm F/4 telephot from the choice of Sony, Nikon or Canon.
A wildlife and sports lenses also have to focus quickly, and 300–600 mm has no problem for its powerful HLA linear motors. The modes of detecting the subject on Sony A7RV were zero issues among me, but Sony will limit you to a maximum of 15 frames per second in burst mode. However, there is a major agreement, and it is the overall weight of Sigma 300–600 mm lens. More than 140 ounces (3985 grams), Sigma is heavier than 600 mm F/4 lenses from other major manufacturers. Catching the lens by hand is incredibly taxed, and a monopod is more essential for this lens than any other brands.
However, let’s not forget that sigma is 300–600 mm is a zoom and therefore acts as several lenses in one. It is extremely useful to have a zoom lens to take a photo of animals when a quick composition change is required or if you find yourself a little out to take a photo to your goal. I think the overall weight is a proper agreement given additional versatility.
Sigma 300-600 mm F/4DG OS Sports: How does it shoot
Can Sigma compete 300-600 mm F/4 if it comes to overall image quality? The first thing I tested was the resistance to provoking the lens. Without it, the contrast is maintained well while shooting the sun of the hood, but I noticed some minor ghosts in the opposite corner. For example, close the aperture from the bottom for F/11, for example, and a large green washed area prevalent in the ghosting frame becomes quite severe. I will always be sure to use the lens hood, whenever I have this lens out and about it.
Bokeh was quite pleasant, which is important how many times the background would be reduced in a soft spot on this lens. Specular highlights have a touch of soap-babble effect, but otherwise they are quite clean. There is a slight hardness for out-of-focus regions, although it is actually worth noting only of those fixed 600 mm lenses that compete against Sigma. Do not make any mistake, the Prime 600 mm lens has a fully visible bokeh, but it is a large extent thanks to the excessive pricing coming with them.
The one who definitely affects me was the level of expansion and sharpness that could be signed. Even if you shoot or close on F/4, and at any focal length, 300–600 mm has a resolution power that requires it. This makes the entire lens useful because there is no meaning in its range that you want to avoid using for any reason. I think most professional wildlife and sports shooter Sigma will be affected by the widespread performance of any available prime option.
Sigma 300-600 mm F/4DG OS Sport: A limited selection of cameras
The only thing that can stop future buyers is related to the lens mount you buy a lens for you. Sony e-mount users will be limited to limited rates to 15 FPS (frame per second), as Sony does with any third-party glass. You can still do continuous continuous tracking autofocus, regardless, and 15 FPS is sufficient for most photographers. However, there is no option available to use Sigma 300–600 mm with e-mount teleconverted, and this can be the biggest negative aspect to own this lens.
When it comes to L-Mount, you can use the teleconverter and there is no FPS limit, but I will argue that leaka and panasonic cameras that you will use with sigma Sports and wildlife are not the most ideal tools for photographyCameras like Lumix S1R II can definitely be used for some work, but I think the e-mount options are far more reliable when it comes to the exact autofocus required for such photography. This is enough to say, I want you to get Sigma 300-600 mm for Nikon and Canon Mount, but so far, this is not an option because neither the company allows Sigma to make a lens for its full-frame cameras.
What are the options?
For equal performance without the same versatility, Sony 600 mm F/4G Master is an excellent but Extremely More expensive options. This incredible value is the true beauty of Sigma 300-600 mm lens. You can also see slow but more affordable Sony 200-600 mm f/5.6-6.3, but you bring constant and bright aperture sigma to the table.
There is no real option in the L-mount, so that it is not much.
Should you buy it?
Yes. All performances with very little money for very little money. Any serious wildlife or action photographer should take a difficult look at Sigma 300-600 mm before deciding on their next telephoto purchase.
