Justice Department list of solutions The move began to force the company to sell Chrome to fix Google’s illegal antitrust behavior and restore competition in the search engine market, and late Friday, Google responded. your own list (included below).
Instead of breaking up Chrome, Android, or Google Play, as the DOJ’s filing acknowledged, Google’s proposed reforms aim to pay companies like Apple and Mozilla for special, preferential placement of their services on Android phones. It has licensing deals with manufacturing companies. , and contracts with wireless carriers. They do not address the DOJ suggestion about possibly Forcing Google to share your valuable search data With other companies to help advance their products.
According to Google’s lawyersThe decision pointed to arrangements with Apple and Mozilla for their browsers, Android phone makers and wireless carriers. Google Regulatory VP Lee-Anne Mulholland Write on company blog“This was a decision regarding our exploration delivery contracts, so our proposed measures are directed at that.
For three years, its proposal would bar Google from signing deals that link the licensing of Chrome, Search and its Android app store, Google Play, to the placement or preinstallation of its other apps, including Chrome, Google Assistant or the Gemini AI assistant. Are.
This would still allow Google to pay for default search placement in browsers, but would allow multiple deals across different platforms or browsing modes and require the ability to revisit deals at least once a year.
While the company still plans to appeal the ruling, Judge Amit Mehta said, “Google is a monopolist, and has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” First , she says she will submit a revised proposal on March 7 before two. A one-week trial on this issue in April.
