FIA’s F1 racing guidelines five major revelations

In one step, the FIA ​​has said that the Formula 1 will bring more “transparency” for the stereotype practices of the race weekend, the governing body of the motorsport has made some of it. Guidelines available to the public for the first time,

Here, the autosport highlights some interesting points from the information in the hand.

Mohammad Ben Sulem put himself in front and center

Most F1 is unlikely to come as a shock for fans, FIA President Mohammad Ben Sulemam could not oppose the urge to create the publication of these guidelines about himself.

With news on Wednesday Carlos Sainz SR has opted to stand in the presidential election later this yearIt looks more indispensable that Ben Sulem will not have to face any competition as his purpose is to win another term.

There are a lot of disputes during his tenure, including the swearing -in guidelines mentioned in the new documents.

The article associated with the guidelines mentioned three times, Ben Sulem also explains why he has been decided to go publicly, saying that Fia Stuvers’: “… surrenders are all often found with extreme and completely unfair criticism.

“To showcase the rigor with which they pursue their role, we are publishing guidelines of punishment and driving standards today that help them in their decisions. This will give media fans and members very deep and more accurately inspiring to decide in Formula 1.”

Other chain suits will follow

The second point of the note before opening one of the documents published by the FIA ​​is also that it is also committed to doing so in other chains that take care of it.

After the publication of the FIA ​​Formula One World Championship Penalty and Driving Standards Guidelines, parallel documents are to be released gradually in six other World Championships of the FIA, with each set accounting for each championship rules and sports specialties, “the statement” said.

This means that the World Dheeraj Championships, Formula E and Fans and other people of the World Rally Championship will also be able to get “deep and more accurate insights” in the process of soon.

Verstappen’s Spanish GP sentence explained

Max Verustapane 10-Place was hit with penalty and three points Mercedes Of George Russell Earlier this month at the end of the Spanish Grand Prix.

This left her on the edge of a race banEither Canada or Austria triggered a suspension to get a total of 12 points over a period of one year with more points. Now the FIA ​​penalty guidelines explain why the punishment was given – and how Verustapain survived the immediate ban.

Barcelona’s stewers admitted that Vastapane caused the reason: “A collision with the result of any immediate and clear game, thus punished upwards – but the stewers decided that the world champion decided:” A conflict with a clear or careless intention, which shuts down their superlikes and where it closes its superlikes and where it is raised. Stayed second behind.

Show your work

Recently, several points have been referred to in the Driving Standards Guidelines Document in Memory.

In an overtaking maneuver, the position of the axle in front of a car in front of a car is a continuous debate during the Grand Prix weekend – although not Monaco probably not Monaco.

Similarly, guidance on track boundaries and giving a permanent profit back, but what the document likes as “justification” behind the practices is some interest in it.

These include: “overtake should be encouraged and not acceptable to defend a situation incorrectly or dangerously, while explaining the roll out in other formulas:” It is very important that the race of junior drivers runs with similar guidelines similar to F1. However, a type of development should be done to reduce low tolerance.

What can be the Canadian GP appeal of red bull for Russell

After coming to fly on the track in Spain, Russell and Vastapane were again involved in an event in Montreal. Behind a late race security car, Verustapane claimed that Russell had taken a break in the wrong way.

After the race, Red Bull appealed to StewardInitially citing the above incident, and at the same time claiming that Russell did not stop within the 10-car length of the security car.

While the method of its appeal changed at night, Russell could be taken into trouble with the initial claims of the Red Bull, the violation of the security car was retained.

“Unnecessarily, incorrectly or in such a way, which can be considered potentially dangerous for other drivers or any other person, while the security car is deployed,” the driver can earn up to four marks on his license along with a fine or 10-second penalty or drive or 10-second stop and penalty.

Meanwhile, “SC fails to keep within the length of 10 cars” takes three penalty points and five or 10-second or drives to the penalty. Russell would be pleased that he was able to show that he was not guilty of those allegations and could celebrate his first win of the resulting season.