| Diagram: Canon |
For many years there was an ideological conflict between brands that pursued optical image stabilization and adopted an in-body approach. Or, to be more accurate among fans, owners and supporters of those brands.
The rush of pro-lens will ignore the fact that their brand adopted optical stabilization in the film age when it was the only practical option, and focus on the fact that optical stabilization is better to correct the large image displacement. Which may be that there may be telephoto lens.
The in-body side of the debate focused on the fact that the sensor-shift stabilization worked with every lens with them and was better in fixing the effects of translational movements, which was a wide-angle and macro shooting bedwill Can do.
We have only found a diagram by Canon which, showing the relative strength and weaknesses of optical and in-body stabilization, solve the debate in a elegant manner. As the diagram explains that both sides were correct. And wrong to indulge in cross-brand biting, obviously.
What indicates with canon, rather in marketing ArticleThis is that this means that you can coordinate and work cooperatively by coordinating the efforts of both attitudes. This is something that we first saw with the double IS2 system of Panasonic and which later appeared in most brands, in the years of intervention.
As a site that makes her best to explain some more complex behaviors in photography, we most appreciate a good diagram.
Thanks to the member of the forum Spider-Merio To bring this diagram to our attention.
