Canon EOS R 50 V vs Sony ZV-E10 II: Battle of Vlogging cameras

Canon EOS R50 V vs Sony Zv-E10 II: Which is the best Vlogging camera?

With the EOS R50 V, the canon has become mainly included in the grounds of manufacturers selling Boxy, EVF-Less APS-C cameras aimed at the purpose of vloggers and videoograpors. People who are considering other models, such as very competent Sony ZV-E10 II, can inspire themselves by tag of EOS R50 V.

In this article, we will break the differences between the two, so that you can find out if it is worth saving money, or springing for a more expensive option.

Vlogging-specific features

Both cameras have a weight of Vlogging-specific features, allowing you to achieve the look and feel that you want. The EOS R50 V has a product demo mode that override its facial autofocus, so the camera will focus on whatever you are holding to show it, a cinematic mode that can be used as a film -like aspect ratio on your footage and can be used as a usb webcam without any additional driver or software. Its violation will switch between the vertical or landscape depending on the orientation of the control camera, and has two record buttons: one on top and a front on the corner of a right hand.

Except for that front-facing record button, the ZV-E10 II has all the features as well as a background defocus mode that you can switch to a wide-fasting aperture for a blurred background. There are some other features that are working for the vloggers that we will cover in later sections.

rolling shutter

The sensor of EOS R50 V is much slower than modern models and hence its standard 4K 24P mode has a fairly poor rolling shutter performance. You have to be careful about how you move the camera and what subjects you shoot to avoid dreaded gelo effects.

The sensor of ZV-E10 II is very fast and has a good rolling shutter performance. If you are shooting for a very fast growing subject or killing the camera from all sides, you will still see a little artwork, but there will be nothing to worry about in most circumstances.

4K 60p Recording

Both cameras can record in 4K 60p, allowing you to shoot videos at a slow pace, or get a hyperline look that appreciates some audiences. However, the EOS R50 V has to harvest in the 1.56x center area of ​​its sensor to read the data rapidly for 60P recording. This will significantly tighten your frame, which, depending on which lens you are using, may not be ideal for Vlogging.

Sony has to be harvested in 4K 60p – in – 1.1x -.

The 4K 60p mode of the ZV-E10 II has a very small crop of 1.1x, so switching it will not change your viewing area almost. Its 4K 60p footage is also oversmpized from 5.6k, while EOS R50 V is a native 4K capture, so it can give a slightly more detailed results.

Colored mode

Both EOS R50 V and ZV-E10 II have a log moder for those looking for standard, punch-to-unique color profiles, 10-bit footage with HLG response curve for HDR playback and a log mode for those looking for more color-grading flexibility.

While the exposure in both cameras is correct and ‘log assist’ modes to give a correct preview aid, Sony lets you load in custom loots and overlay them, let you preview your ‘look’ of choice; However they will not be ripened in footage. The ZV-E10 II also has Sony’s S-Cinetone profile, which is less contrast than the standard color mode and thus gives you more space to edit, without the need for more grading as a full-on log.

Both cameras also include different types of other color mode presets that you can get twenty -one, which are to simulate some styles if you do not want to spend time to do it yourself in the post.

Autofocus

Sony and Canon’s autofocus systems are on top of both packs. Their tracking algorithms are generally reliable, and their subject recognition modes are even more.

The ZV-E10 II is less of the available people, though; It can identify humans, animals and birds, but EOS R50 V can remove all those, plus vehicles. It also has a “auto” mode that will automatically detect the subject types if they are in the frame, which can work if you often switch between humans and animals, people and cars, etc.

In both examples, these systems perform hand-in-hard work with the rest of the AF system: selecting a recognized subject near your chosen AF point, if you want to specify.

Audio

Both cameras have microphones and headphone sockets and when combined with their respective multi-function shoes accessories, Charis can support the audio. However, while the EOS R50 V has a standard stereo internal microphone, the ZV-E10 II has a three-cap model that lets you choose to choose whether you want it to be a bias towards sounds coming from a certain direction.

Even more importantly, audio quality from multi-capsses mix is ​​usually nothing to write about the house), ZV-E10 II contains an alcoholic wind inhibitor for its underlying microphone. You have to buy one separately for EOS R50 V to get usable audio without external microphones.

Shooting stils

Neither camera is especially fun to use for shooting stils, thanks to an EVF deficiency and the other for the lack of top-plate control dial. However, the EOS R50 V has the advantage of a mechanical second-dead shooter, while the ZV-E10 II only has a completely electronic shutter. This means that the canon has a lot of flash sink speed: 1/250 second vs. 1/30 seconds for Sony.

Flash on one side, both cameras can produce pleasing images with good colors. Sony technically has a high resolution sensor with 26MP compared to 24MP of Canon, but such a small difference is not noticeable in the use of the real world.

Excessive

Both cameras have some small things that are standing outside. For example, the EOS R50 V has a second tripod socket on its side, which simplifies the shooting vertical video as to attach its tripi plate to a separate part of the camera. This also includes false-colored monitoring, which can help you in nail risk for skin tones.

The ZV-E10 II separates itself with a side-mounted SD card slot, which means that you have to remove your tripod plate at any time to get on your video, something that can happen with EOS R50 V. However, the 10GBPS USB-C port on the canon is twice rapid, so Sony is an alternative option.

Sony also chose to use a very large battery in the ZV-E10 II, which can be helpful on prolonged shooting. The battery life on EOS R50 V is not bad, and both cameras can charge via USB-C while using, but you will not have to reach the power lead often with Sony.

Kit lens

Both cameras can be given options with powerzoom lenses, which have focal lengths that are suited for Vlogging. Canon launched EOS R50 V with 14–30 mm F4-6.3 lens (22–48 mm equiv), which is sufficient, which will be long enough to Vlog with most people’s weapons, even with 1.56x crops for 4K 60p (equal to 35-75 mm). You can get it for $ 200 when purchased with EOS R50 V.

16–50 mm f3.5-5.6 (24–75 mm equivine.) Sony lens is more versatile: it can zoom much further, it is sharp on both ends and adds $ 100 to only price. And when it is not wide as a canon, it ends in the 60p mode of ZV-E10 II due to being 26.4 mm equivalent. Compared to the canon’s lens which ends as 35 mm equivine. Thanks to its more severe 60p crop. However, we are not particularly thrilled by the image quality of Sony lens-we won’t be surprised if many ZV-E10 II owners want to sharpen something, although they have to leave the power facility to achieve it.

conclusion

While EOS R50 V is a competent camera with some interesting features such as its side-mounted tipi socket, ZV-E10 II’s sharp sensor and large battery, which makes it a overall more powerful camera for the video. However, it comes at a price, literally – its cost is $ 350 more. Depending on the film you are doing, it may not be worth paying extra; If you are shooting most of the semi-static subjects indoors, the rolling shutter and 4K 60p crops may not be a matter of as big anxiety.

It is also difficult to ignore that you can buy a cheap gimbal with your EOS R50 V and still come forward receiving very little unstable handheld videos. However, if you are shooting for rapid moving subjects, or the background defocus button and microphone pickup field selectors such as additional bells and whistles, Sony definitely still makes its price tag right.

Source link