Portrait shooters continue to revolve around 135 mm, and for a good reason. You get compression, subject separation, and access, which immediately make for striking images.
Coming from you Dustin abotThis completely video pits Wiltrox AF 135 mm F/1.8 Lab Fee Against new Sigma 135 mm F/1.4 DG Art And shows where each lens pulls forward. The value sets the tone rapidly, in which Wiltrox is coming in $ 899, while Sigma descends at $ 1,899, and that the difference of $ 1,000 changes that you want to “want” the “vs” needs. Sigma’s F/1.4 aperture cleaner the subject cutout and large, rounder specular highlights, plus buys in Dim Venue in the additional headroom. Viltrox counter with low deformation, light weight, a small hood, and a favorable 82 mm filter size instead of 105 mm wallet punch, which affects how you kit with ND or spread filter
Abbott’s test autofocus front and center holds, both lenses focus quickly and quietly in real scenes. When you are in the area instead of a studio, you also see practical handling differences. The sigma bends into a more modern interface with a locking hood and a ship with a locking hood and a tripod collar, which on sticks or when you want rotation control, while the Wiltrox bends in a more modern interface with an LCD and two function buttons, which can be programmed for tricks such as preset focus, drawing through the app. If you live at a minimum focus, 0.25 × magnification and low focus distance of viltrox are open details such as tight details, flowers, or ring shots without arriving for a dedicated macro, and this advantage also appears in the background with a slower aperture.
Where Sigma earns her premium, it is a look. At the same framing and distance, the infection in the out-of-focus from the in-focus appears smooth, and the highlights first remain circular because you stop the thanks to the 13 blade. The additional two-thirds stops also helps to keep the ISO in the check under poor light or reduce motion blur when you want to freeze hair flixes or handheld candidates. If you shoot stars or night pictures, the combination of brightness, low vigning, and high wide sharpness is a niche that fills the sigma well. If your work bends to clean geometry and you hate massaging the Pinciusian in the post, then the Wiltrox default is basically a simple file with zero visible deformation on reforms
If you need f/1.4, look at specific pictures at distance and care about the most soft background rendering, Sigma Pick. If you give importance to keep $ 1,000 for low deformation, close focus, small filters, and lighting or other body, then Viltrox makes a strong case. The video chart moves through crops, picture scenarios, flare behavior and specular highlight shape, so you can judge business-bounds from your own eyes instead of pixel-pest-matchshot. Watch the video above for full randon from Abbott.
