In every genre, there are stories that either blatantly rip off or reinterpret the material of a prior picture without being considered a traditional remake. No matter which fantasy worlds, sci-fi adventures, or action movies you’re stepping into, more than likely, you’ve already seen something similar before. This is maybe especially true in the Western, a genre that thrives on either staying true to or subverting its own genre tropes to tell an impactful frontier tale. Not even Clint Eastwood is immune to this type of imitating, as his 1985 Western Pale Rider feels suspiciously similar to another film that hit theaters a few decades prior: the 1953 Oscar-winner Shane. But while these films share similar plots, the details are different enough to make each of them stand apart on their own.
How Is ‘Pale Rider’ Similar to ‘Shane’?
It’s not uncommon for Westerns to share a similar, or in some cases the exact same, basic story with other pictures. John Wayne films did this all the time, perhaps most notably with El Dorado and Rio Bravo. In the 1990s, two Wyatt Earp biopics centered on the gunfight at the O.K. Corral in Tombstone, Arizona, with Kevin Costner and Kurt Russell each playing the character, albeit interpreting the lawman differently. In the case of Clint Eastwood’s Pale Rider — the filmmaker’s only Western of the 1980s — the plot derives directly from the 1950s George Stevens-directed classic. Shane is an incredible Western. It pulls from just about every traditional Western idea we’ve seen before yet without feeling too clichéd. The tortured gunslinger with a heart of gold, the corrupt cattleman hoping to rule the town, and the smiling black hat with a penchant for violence. It’s all here.
But Shane and Pale Rider only really intersect in terms of the basic plot itself. Both films follow a lone stranger who wanders into town on unfinished business only to find himself working for a local family struggling to make a living off the land they’ve settled on. These struggles have been made harder by a ruthless land baron who hopes to either drive the pioneers and homesteaders off the land completely or pay them to work for him instead. In either case, the townsfolk refuse. As a result, another man (one who “takes care of things”) is called in to stir up more trouble and end the conflict, sort of like a strike-breaker or some other violent enforcer. Our wandering hero has it out with this villain, comes out on top, and rides off on horseback into the mountains — presumably to die. While audiences and critics have connected the dots between these two pictures, there is no official confirmation that Pale Rider is indeed a remake of Shane — and maybe that’s for the best.
‘Pale Rider Is a Clear Homage to ‘Shane’ and Classical Western History
The clear threads between these films make it obvious that Clint Eastwood likely intended Pale Rider to at least be an homage to Shane. It’s a clear, though exceptional, recycling of the material that’s loaded with depth and classical horse opera flare. When speaking about the 1953 flick specifically, Eastwood once revealed his impressions of the titular character in an interview with the American Film Institute. “Alan Ladd (was) a very small man in stature, but he seemed much, much larger than life in this particular film,” the filmmaker noted in a clip juxtaposed with Shane‘s final shoot-out. On another occasion, Eastwood told AFI that what makes a good Western is ultimately a good story, pure and simple. “I think that the story is the king,” he explained, “and that everything else is interpretive art around it…”
It’s no wonder then that, if Eastwood was going to pull from any traditional Western plot, Shane would be the production he’d steal from. Not only was the film — which was, in turn, based on a 1949 novel by Jack Schaefer — an impressive display of Western prowess, earning itself an Academy Award for Best Cinematography (and rightfully so), but the plot is based in pure Old West history. Shane itself was an adaptation of the events of the historic Johnson County War, a Wyoming-based conflict that pitted homesteaders against the cattle companies that aimed to take away their stock and water rights.
While the plot of both Shane and Pale Rider only lasts a few months at most, the Johnson County War lasted for several years. The range war was largely mythologized by authors and filmmakers over the years, and was either adapted or referenced in productions such as True Grit, Heaven’s Gate, and the 2002 miniseries Johnson County War. Though, of all the great adaptations of homesteading conflicts such as these, Shane and Pale Rider are among the very best. Even so, there are still plenty of differences that make both Alan Ladd and Clint Eastwood’s versions particularly compelling. Though they share similar plot threads, their leading men are quite different, which produces different results.
Shane and the Preacher Have Different Outlooks on Violence
If you’re tempted to think that Pale Rider and Shane are just the exact same movies, think again. Eastwood’s Western takes a different approach to the issues of love and violence that make the 1953 film feel so timeless, and that’s to Pale Rider‘s benefit. In Shane, there is no mistaking that the titular hero is a genuine gunslinger with a rough-and-ready past. Alan Ladd’s Shane is a tortured individual who hopes to escape his younger years of violence and yet springs into action at the sound of a gun. He doesn’t think twice about taking on a half dozen men on his own to prove he’s worth his mettle. When it comes down to the final confrontation between Shane and Jack Palance‘s smiley-but-deadly Jack Wilson, our hero walks right into the bar knowing that he’s going to kill these men and walk away. If not for the surprise attacker from above, Shane would’ve walked out without a scratch.
But in Pale Rider, the mysterious preacher (Eastwood) is never presented as a gunslinger or any type of fighter. For most of the film, he doesn’t even carry a firearm, and we know next-to-nothing about him. When he first meets Hull Barret (Michael Moriarty), he saves him with a simple bucket of water and a wooden beam. After that, he’s just a hardworking man of the cloth. It’s not until he decides to confront Marshal Stockburn (John Russell) himself that he retrieves his guns from safekeeping while leaving his clerical collar behind. Contrary to Shane, the preacher doesn’t initially shy away from violence; instead, it’s his main approach. He tries, at first, to broker peace between the independent miners and Coy LaHood (Richard Dysart), but when that doesn’t work, violence inevitably ensues. Even so, the preacher is saved by Hull in the end, while Shane requires no such salvation.
Love Is a Complex Theme In Both ‘Pale Rider’ and ‘Shane’
As far as love is concerned, these movies take vastly different approaches to romance. From the get-go, there’s a clear subtext between Shane and Joe Starrett’s (Van Heflin) wife Marian (Jean Arthur), but it’s never quite explored on the screen. Shane understands that he’s not the type of man that’s right for a woman, and he respects Joe enough not to jeopardize his marriage. In fact, the gunslinger is even willing to beat up Joe in front of his bride if it means that the rancher won’t follow Shane to kill Wilson and Ryker (Emile Meyer), which would likely have left Marian a widow. Shane cares deeply about the Starrett family, and while he has some unresolved feelings for Marian, he honors them best by protecting her family, even from himself.
1:30
Related
Burt Reynolds Ended Up in Western Production Hell Because of Clint Eastwood
Eastwood’s recommendation led Reynolds to take on a role he would quickly regret.
On the other hand, Pale Rider‘s preacher, despite his name and assumed vocation, is willing to partake in this forbidden fruit. Eastwood’s character holds a clear affection for Sarah Wheeler (Carrie Snodgress) and even spends the night with her (despite her commitment to marry Hull). Some have noted that this love affair seems to come out of nowhere, but that may speak to the preacher’s apparent supernatural origins (more on this in a moment). But if it wasn’t enough that Sarah has eyes for him, her daughter, Megan (Sydney Penny), carries a torch for the man as well, all the way to the very end of the picture. “We love you, I love you,” she calls out as he rides away, leaving behind any chance at mortal happiness. While both film’s love connections end the same way, Shane takes the more honorable approach.
There’s Another Major Difference Between ‘Pale Rider’ and ‘Shane’
Shane is your traditional, technicolor Western that appeals to the genre’s most basic sensibilities. There’s nothing here you won’t expect, and that’s to the film’s benefit. In some ways, Shane is the archetypal Western from which all others ultimately derive. Despite no appearances from John Wayne or Jimmy Stewart, it’s about as classic a horse opera as you can get, and that’s part of why it remains one of the genre’s most influential tales. You just can’t beat it, and it’s no wonder then that modern pictures such as James Mangold‘s Logan still call back to it over sixty years later. But while Pale Rider certainly echoes Shane‘s classical ideals, it factors in a spiritual component that the original lacked. The preacher is, well, a preacher, sure, but that’s not the only detail added in. Pale Rider quickly becomes a supernatural Western, albeit not in the traditionally demonic sense.
As is the case with most Western heroes, the preacher arrives in Carbon Canyon from out of nowhere and later leaves without us knowing where he’s going. Like a ghost, he wanders in and out of the lives of the local miners without hardly any fuss at all. Only this time, the preacher actually is a spirit-made-flesh, one called from the great beyond by Megan’s prayers. Though Pale Rider doesn’t confirm this directly in the narrative, it masterfully clues us in throughout. For starters, when the preacher confronts Stockburn at the end of the film, the marshal compares him to a man he knows is dead. This comes after the revelation that Eastwood’s character has six bullet wounds in his back (wounds he likewise inflicts on Stockburn). This may also explain why the Wheeler girls took such a quick liking to the stranger, he may have resembled (or perhaps simply was) Megan’s father. To make things clearer, the moment the preacher rides into the camp is juxtaposed with Megan’s reading from the biblical Book of Revelation, specifically Revelation 6:8, which says, “And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him.”
It can be presumed that the preacher was brought to Carbon Canyon as an “avenging angel.” He arrives to “make things right” for the mistreated settlers, not unlike Shane’s relationship with the homesteaders. Only, his work comes directly from a Higher Power, making his victory a sure one. The film’s very title echoes the idea that the preacher might not be as human now as he once was, and the fact that he ends up walking away from every fight without so much of a scratch all but confirms this. Shane ends with its hero wounded and riding toward the Grand Tetons to die away from prying eyes, while Pale Rider concludes with the preacher’s return to the mountains from whence he came — returning to the afterlife, now at peace. The ending alone echoes Eastwood’s 1973 Western, High Plains Drifter, though Shane remains this picture’s clearest source of inspiration.
Clint Eastwood’s ‘Pale Rider’ Honors ‘Shane’ as an Unofficial “Soft Remake”
For the most part, critics received Pale Rider well, with many obvious comparisons drawn to Shane. But while some considered Pale Rider to be an impressive entry in Eastwood’s filmography — Roger Ebert called it “a considerable achievement, a classic Western of style and excitement” — not everyone was overly impressed. “Pale Rider does nothing to disprove the wisdom that this genre is best left to the revival houses,” Richard Corliss wrote for TIME Magazine. “A double feature of Shane and Eastwood’s High Plains Drifter will do just fine, thanks.” But Pale Rider is more than just a riff on Shane or even Eastwood’s previous gunslinger outing. The film takes concepts from both pictures and weaves them seamlessly together in a way that honors the original material while also crafting something that feels new. Frankly, Pale Rider stands out as quite unique despite the clear influences, both fictional and historical, it pulls from.
The truth is that Pale Rider is different enough from Shane that it can’t be considered a direct remake. If it was, no doubt folks would be disappointed in all the changes. No longer does the stranger help a band of honest homesteaders, but instead a band of starving gold miners. The hero isn’t a gunslinger with a troubled past, but rather a mysterious, ghostly preacher. Even the romance and violence hold different significance here in Eastwood’s film than they do in George Stevens’ film, and that’s not to mention that Shane propagates the myth of the American West while Pale Rider takes a more historically-based, revisionist approach to the genre. And yet, even in all of this, Pale Rider honors the original material well, playing more as a pure homage to the 1953 film rather than an uninspired plagiarization. If you haven’t seen this Clint Eastwood picture, it’s well worth your time, but just be sure to start with Shane, the original Western classic.
Pale Rider is available to stream on Tubi in the U.S.
Pale Rider
- Release Date
-
June 28, 1985
- Cast
-
Clint Eastwood
, Michael Moriarty
, Carrie Snodgress
, Chris Penn
, Sydney Penny
, Richard Dysart
, Richard Kiel
, Doug McGrath
, John Russell - Runtime
-
115 minutes
- Writers
-
Michael Butler
, Dennis Shryack - Studio(s)
-
Malpaso Productions
, Warner Bros. - Distributor(s)
-
Warner Bros.
