President Donald Trump attends a cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington on 10 April 2025.
Nathan Howard | Roots
A group of five small businesses sued the President Donald Trump On Monday, trying to block the new Tariff They have imposed Foreign imports In recent weeks.
Sue in US Court of International Trade It is alleged that Trump has illegally provoked the power of the Congress, claiming that the business deficit along with other people Countries Formed an emergency.
“The Congress has not entrusted any such power,” the suit says. “Law President
Invokes – International emergency economic powers act ,
Liberty justice centerThe owner-operated companies said that Trump’s new tariffs at least 10% on imports Higher rates from most countries and other countries are destroying small businesses across the country.
Says suit, “Their claimed emergency is an estimate of their own imagination: lack of trade, which remained for decades without economic loss, are not emergency.”
“And neither do these trade deficit ‘form unusual and extraordinary threats.”
The Liberty Justice Center mentioned that the Trump administration also imposed tariffs on countries with which the United States does not have a trade deficit, “to further reduce the justification of the administration.”
“This court should declare the President’s unprecedented power illegally, involving the operation of executive functions, which is to implement these tariffs under IEPA and to confirm the main founding theory of this country: there will be no taxation without representation,” suit says.
The plaintiffs included in New York Vose selectionWhich imports and distributes small-production wine, souls and sacks; Fishusa In Pennsylvania, creating a retail and wholesale e-commerce business and selling sportfishing tackle and related gear; And Genova pipe In uta, which makes fittings for plastic pipes, drain, and plumbing, irrigation, drainage and electrical applications,
Microcits LLC In Virginia, which creates educational electronic kits and musical instruments, and Terry prics cyclingA vermont-based brand of women’s cycling apparel is also a plaintiff.
The suit states, “Terry Cycling has already paid $ 25,000 in unplanned tariffs this year, for which Terry was the records of records, and the Terry projects were that the tariff would spend about $ 250,000 to the company by the end of 2025.”
In 2026, Terry Cycling hopes that “tariff costs face an estimated $ 1.2 million – an amount that is not just alive for its size business,” suits.
The CNBC has requested a comment from the White House on the trial.
