Wednesday, April 16, 2025
spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img
HomeGadgets$ 300 Moto G Power is worth buying the lowest price Motorola...

$ 300 Moto G Power is worth buying the lowest price Motorola phone


$ 300 Moto G Power The lowest price Motorola phone is that I can confidently recommend with the company’s 2025 lineup. Even after using it for several weeks, Moto G Power never disappointed me while performing any regular tasks. If you are already a Motorola fan, this phone is a great option that can handle the basics without breaking the bank.

It may not look like high appreciation, but during the test I felt that I felt than dull $ 200 Moto GThis additional $ 100 sets a long way. Moto G power provides adequate additional power to allow smooth multitasking, video calls, gaming in low graphics settings and can take concentrate photos of food in bright settings as well as darker settings as well as darker settings.

Charging speed is a special highlight; The Moto G Power’s battery went away from 0 to 61% during my battery test when it was given power with 30W wired charger, which is actually a hair faster than the previous year version of the phone. It is accompanied by 15W wireless charging, but like most Android phones, you will need to get a third-party case if you want to use the phone with magnetic Qi2 Chargers,

Moto G Power Leaf Green (seen here) and slate falls in gray.

Mike Sorantino/Senate

Fast charging is particularly helpful, given that the power has a 6.8-inch 1,080p display that runs at a 120Hz refresh rate, which can reduce the battery during more intensive use. This display makes video, texting and light gaming easy to stream, but it does not provide especially vivid HDR-like color as I have seen on other $ 300 phones like OnePlus Nord n30But this is an OK trade-off for a large extent low-priced phone.

The phone’s MediaTek Demistance 6300 processor performed slightly better in my benchmark tests than $ 200 Moto G (with the same processor), including more graphically intense 3DMark Wildlife Extreme Extreme Test, and more computationally focused Geekbench 6.0.

Moto G Power vs Moto G benchmark

Geekbench 6.0 3 DIMark Wildlife Extreme 30 minute. Fast charging test (charging speed/result) YouTube streaming drain test starts at 100%
Moto G Power (2025) Single: 793; Multi: 2,086 384; 2.3fps 30W: 0% to 61% 1 HR: 93%; 2 HR: 85%; 3 HR: 75% (120 Hz)
Moto G (2025) Single: 784; Multi: 1,970 384; 2.3fps 30W; 0% to 51% 1 HR: 92%; 2 hours: 84%; 3 HR: 76% (120 Hz)

Out of gaming, I did not face any issue. I had no problem with my normal routine of watching YouTube, browsing websites and taking video calls. However, the phone struggled to maintain 60fps while running Marvel Snap Card Games in medium settings. The phone’s 8GB memory – 4GB available on Moto G twice – possibly helps to run the phone more efficiently in daily use. This is a contrast to the opposite of Moto G, which was found to be barely useful without enabling the RAM boost feature of Motorola that converts a portion of storage into virtual memory. The power default works quite well using “AI” mode, to assess how much is required.

Moto G Power has a 50-megapixel wide camera and an 8-megapixel ultravide camera.

Mike Sorantino/Senate

Both rear camera setups (50-megapixel wide and 8-megapixel ultravide) and photos taken by 16-megapixel selfie camera receive my photos imperatives, but a large extent lacks fine expansion.

For example, this closeup of Macaroni and Paneer dish that takes out shows you the dish, but we are not getting the rough or breadcrumb details of most things. In fact, everything around the dish feels blurred.

Food photo taken on Moto G Power.

Mike Sorantino/Senate

I took the phone with me to see Kylie Minogue at Madison Square Garden, and seeing that I am sitting behind the arena, I think the phone was able to hold some details of the singer with his dancers. This is the kind of picture that will struggle even more expensive phones, so I am happy that it did not dissolve in a completely blurred disturbance.

Kylie Minogue Concert, Moto G Power was taken at Madison Square Garden.

Mike Sorantino/Senate

While taking a selfie, the front camera also exceeded my expectations. I used selfie light – which is painful in the dazzle of my glasses – but most of my face and shirt looks crisp in the photo. My hair mixes with darkness, and there is a noticeable image noise around me. But still, these are also a challenging position for the phone in the $ 500 price range, so for $ 300, it is not bad at all.

A vertical front-facing camera photo taken on Moto G power, and placed on a horizontal background.

Mike Sorantino/Senate

Cameras can also capture 1080p videos at 30fps resolution, which was sufficient to capture the footage of band Enberlin at a separate show last week, but it is believed that this footage was also not very detailed. This is enough to store memories quickly, but I do not want to play them back on TV.

Moto G Power runs on Android 15. It will get two -year major software updates and three -year security updates.

Mike Sorantino/Senate

While I could not submerge Moto G Power during my test, I appreciate that its IP68 and IP69 ratings show that it will easily avoid drops in a sink or pool. But even a durable exterior cannot mask one of its greatest weaknesses; Motorola’s relatively low software and safety support schedules. The phone will get only two -year major Android updates and three years of security updated support. While I have yet tested Samsung’s new Galaxy A lineup, one of the biggest contestants of Moto G, Samsung is comparatively promising six years of software and security updates. This is a policy that I hope that Motorola rethinks, because the Moto G line can become a comprehensive option for buyers who can increase the cost of electronics.

As long as you can stop your expectations about the three -year lifetime of the phone, Moto G Power can be a viable option for anyone, which requires just a basic phone without extra frills.

Motorola Moto G Power (2025) vs Motorola Moto G (2025) vs Samsung Galaxy A26 5G

Moto G Power 2025 Moto G2025 Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
Performance size, resolution 6.8-inch LCD display; 2,388×1,080 pixels; 120Hz fresh rate 6.7-inch LCD; 1,604×720 pixels; 120Hz fresh rate 6.7-inch amoled; 2,340 x 1,080 pixels; 120Hz fresh rate
Pixel density 387 ppi 263ppi 385 ppi
Dimensions (inch) 6.57 x 3.03 x 0.34 6.57x3x0.32 in. 6.46 x 3.05 x 0.3
Dimensions 167 x 77 x 8.7 mm 167.05×76.3×8.16 mm 164 x 77.5 x 7.7 mm
Weight (ounce, village) 208g (7.34 oz) 193 g 200G (7.05 oz.)
Mobile software Android 15 Android 15 Android 15
Quarrel 50-megapixel (wide), 8-megapixel (ultravide) 50-megapixel (wide), 2-megapixel (macro) 50-megapixel (wide), 8-megapixel (ultravide), 2-megapixel (macro)
front facing camera 16-megapixel 16-megapixel 13 megapixels
video capture 1080p on 30fps 720p on 30fps TBD
Processor MediaTek Demensity 6300 MediaTek Demensity 6300 Acinos 1380
Ram/storage 8GB + 128GB 4GB + 128GB 6GB + 128GB
Expandable storage Yes Yes, microsd nobody
battery charger 5,000 months 5,000mah 5,000mah
Fingerprint sensor Side Side Side
Additive USB-C USB-C USB-C
Headphone jack Yes Yes nobody
Special symptoms 30W Wired Charging, 15W Wireless Charging, IP68 and IP69 Water Resistance, MIL-STD 810H Certification, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC, 2 year software updates, 3 years security update, moto gestures, Ram boost 30W Wired Charging, Water-Rejugent Design (IP52), Bluetooth 5.3, NFC, 2 year software updates, 3 year security updates, moto gestures, RAM boost Galaxy AI, Vanue 7, Circle to Search, Object Eraser, 6 generation endoid OS, 6-year software and security aid, IP67 Water & Dust Resistance, 10-bit HDR recording
Value-assigned (USD) $ 300 $ 200 (4GB + 128GB) $ 300 (128GB)
Price (GBP) N/A N/A Changes to £ 240
Price (AUD) N/A N/A AU converts to $ 485

How do we test the phone

Every phone CNET review team test Used in the real world. We test the features of a phone, play games and take photos. We check the display to see if it is bright, sharp and lively. We analyze the design and build to see how to catch it and whether it has an IP rating for water resistance. We push the processor performance using a standardized benchmark tools such as Geekbench and 3DMark, as well as navigate the interface of our own renewers, as well as the interface, record high-resolution videos and play graphically acute games at high fresh rates.

All cameras are tested under different circumstances, from bright sunlight to dark indoor scenes. We try special features such as night mode and portrait mode, and compare our conclusions against competitive phones with a similar price. We can see battery life daily using a series of battery drain tests.

We take into account additional features such as 5G, satellite connectivity, fingerprint and face sensor, stylus support, fast charging speed and support for foldable displays, which may be useful. We balance all this against the price to give a decision on that phone whether the phone, whatever the price, really represents the good price. Although these tests may not always be reflected in the initial review of CNET, we do follow -up and long -term tests under most circumstances.

Look at this: Buy or wait guide: how to change technical prices and what to do next





Source link

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Enable Notifications OK No thanks